No. 23-1191
Dru Choker, et al. v. National Veterinary Associates, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: antitrust antitrust-standing civil-procedure conspiracy damage-relief damages impending-injury monopolistic-behavior monopoly sherman-act standing
Key Terms:
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a party injured by antitrust behavior leading to a monopolistic end has standing for damage relief under the Sherman Act's 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and 15.
Whether the court or a jury determines when conspirators' violation of the antitrust act is sufficiently "impending" to inflict injury allowing for damages under the Sherman Act's 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and 15.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party injured by antitrust behavior leading to a monopolistic end has standing for damage relief under the Sherman Act's 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and 15
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent National Veterinary Associates, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent PET EMERGENCY CLINIC, P.S. to respond filed.
2024-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Dru Choker, et al.
Mary E. Schultz — Mary Schultz Law, P.S., Petitioner
National Veterinary Associates, Inc.
James A. McPhee — Witherspoon Brajcich McPhee, PLLC, Respondent
PET EMERGENCY CLINIC, P.S.
Brian William Esler — Miller Nash LLP, Respondent