No. 23-1005

Ann Redd-Oyedele v. Santa Clara County Office of Education, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: age-discrimination burden-of-proof civil-rights disparate-impact due-process employment employment-practices preponderance-of-evidence racial-discrimination summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a Court may properly grant summary
judgment where a party failed to establish, by a
preponderance of evidence, as shown in the records,
that the party defendant's excuse for failure to
promote was not a pretext for racial and or age
discrimination.

Whether a Court may properly deny summary
judgment on racial discrimination claim where a pro
se party presented credible and relevant evidence of
historical racial prejudice against African American
employees of the Respondent.

Whether the employment practices and policies of
Respondent SCCOE has a disparate impact on
minority employees of the SCCOE, especially African
Americans.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Court may properly grant summary judgment where a party failed to establish, by a preponderance of evidence, as shown in the records, that the party defendant's excuse for failure to promote was not a pretext for racial and or age discrimination

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Santa Clara County Office of Education to respond filed.
2024-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Ann Redd-Oyedele
Ann Redd-Oyedele — Petitioner
Santa Clara County Office of Education
Eric J. BengtsonDavis Bengtson & Young, APLC, Respondent