No. 22-6910
Carolyn L. Fields v. Hunter Conrad, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process eeoc-complaint employment employment-discrimination government-job human-relations-commission pro-se-representation retaliation standing workplace-harassment wrongful-termination
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
ISN'T TRUE THAT EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO AN ATTORNEY?
WHAT WAS MY CHANCE OF SUCCESS WITHOUT PROPER REPRESENTATION?
DOES THIS CASE NOT HAVE MERIT AND INTEGRITY?
HOW LONG, AFTER WAITING FOR FIVE (5) HOURS VIA EMAIL TO GET A RESPONSE FROM A REQUEST TO LEAVE @ 4:30 PM ON AUGUST 19, 2019.?
WHY WOULD BRITTANY HOLLEY EVEN TRY IT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is everyone entitled to an attorney?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Petitioner complied with order of May 1, 2023.
2023-05-23
Application (22A1013) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 21, 2023.
2023-05-18
Application (22A1013) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of May 1, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-05-01
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 22, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-03
Waiver of right of respondents Hunter Conrad, et al. to respond filed.
2023-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Carolyn L. Fields
Carolyn. L. Fields — Petitioner
Hunter Conrad, et al.
F. Damon Kitchen — Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, Respondent