No. 22-5663

Danny Terron Roney v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation contract-rights due-process legal-procedure property sovereign-rights standing takings witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-10-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

1.) Who owns the Dollar General Scores corporation?

2) Did the AUSA investigate who owns that franchise that was claiming to have been robbe^?

3) What was the source of the merchandise for sale in that Dollar GEneral store?

4)Do you judges each expect to be particularly described on any warrant or would you accept any name that accuses you that wasnot your proper name?

5)Do you judges really believe that youcan deny Roney, Sr. his sovereignty but still claim you are sovereign?

6) Does a man's signature reflect his sovereignty?

7) D id Cogburn, Jr's statement in his opinion that M E Coleman, counsel, was acting as the Att'y for the government as he specifically stated, as 18USC4 241(a)only for that evaluation [Civil action allows the Attorney for the government to move suit] psychological exam on $-1-2016 as per 4241(a) if lawful, only allows that one for such examination but existing lawor the judge in the criminal action to move that Danny T. Roney, Sr. was involved in a criminal proceeding when the [civil action suit] was never filed Against him nor could it be so filed then per Nov. 1, 1909 Kaufman v Garner CCWDKY 173F550; therefore, Roney's counsel was not his counsel.;,but the Attorney for the government?

8)Cogburn, JR. cited the Strickland v Wash, controversy test for the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel, illegally as the SCOTUS wrote it, citing the conditions of judgment but 4y cannot do that as the Congress muSt do «t as per the ConstituTion's pRovision in At*. 3, sect. 2, Cl. 1 with such exceptions . as Cong citation to refer to as the SCOTUS can orillystates ress shall make.; What is the proper lawfuljunlawful, not set conditions by which they judge such acts?

9) WHy did a BuNCombe COunty Deputy follow a motorist exercising his/her contract rights that the State cannot impair by any law anguarantees in the courts by the federal Constitution's provision Art. i, sect. IP, cl,/l, as valid contracts are property in the Fourteenth Amendment nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation; June 14, 1934 Lynch v US 290US 571 54Sct840 78Ledl434, So, how did that cop justify violating the motorist's contract rights on her own privately contracted property that the State guarantees the law and her rights as well as her property?judge an act that one to enforce to her after the cop did trespass To cite June. 15, 1977 Avery v US D..Conn. 434Fsupp935 from Marbury v Madison 1803 5US137 ,170,171 2Led60 No government official can have discretion to commit uncon sTitutiona.l or illegal acts.on

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Who owns the Dollar General Stores corporation?

Docket Entries

2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-21
Application (22A249) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 2, 2022.
2022-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)
2022-06-15
Application (22A249) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 4, 2022 to September 2, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Danny Terron Roney
Danny Terron Roney — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent