Andre Thompson v. United States
i) 14I approach od \% US. Cf fcj U) CA)
Courts allowed or retired b look to the
J wlort it ordinarily invo
Jicab crime ad i/ioknce fpplymj jit Catz^ en a
-* the clemtnh clause , areatica
lytSj Kilnn deterrninihj id n ovf u/.e od.an.o
that offnstdfense
l idlesan
06 (X pre fyUtk
l4en applying ftCortegoriaal approach of \% U.S.C.. $ ?.M(c/C3XAj /lowed to determine id fl,c the elements ciausi
elements of a/i offensecourts t'cc^uirtd are or a-)■
los as an element tl /"e <pir.es )-J.n i/oIvZS
in stead of determining i f 4-lz offense itself I>
od physical -force.. od e ustj,. or
physical dorez as as an,
element fhe use/ > • •
When applying the categorical approach of 18 U.S.C. §924(c), the elements clause, are courts allowed or required to look to the nature of an offense and what it ordinarily involves, when determining whether that offense qualifies as a predicate crime of violence?