No. 22-5264
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: concurrent-sentence constitutional-scrutiny criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-procedure federal-sentence post-conviction-relief sentencing sixth-circuit state-sentence
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the due process rights of the Petitioner were violated by the failure of the trial court to address, first at sentencing and then in a post-sentencing motion made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a), a specific request that a remaining state sentence run concurrently with the Petitioner's federal sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the due process rights of the Petitioner were violated
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Cody Gober
Robert Dee Hobbs — Bell & Hobbs, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent