No. 22-326

In Re Adam Bruzzese

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure due-process employment employment-action federal-agency government-employment mandamus-writ property-rights
Latest Conference: 2022-11-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), a federal agency administered by the Department of Justice (DOJ), deprive Bruzzese of his property by administering an adverse employment action without due process?

Will the Supreme Court of the United States compel ATF/DOJ to reverse the adverse employment action if it was administered in violation of due process?

Should a Writ of Mandamus require the District Court for the Eastern District if New York to impanel a jury for trial of the legal issues or damages raised by the deprivation of property without due process?

Does the ATF/DOJ failure to adhere to any of the aspects of due process in administering the adverse employment action necessitate a per curiam decision in favor of Bruzzese?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the ATF deprive Bruzzese of his property without due process?

Docket Entries

2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-26

Attorneys

In Re Adam Bruzzese
Adam Bruzzese — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent