No. 22-231

Artur Davis v. Legal Services Alabama, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
CVSGAmici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights civil-rights-act employer-actions employment-discrimination employment-terms pay race-discrimination section-1981 suspension title-vii
Key Terms:
ERISA SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26 (distributed 5 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Do Title VII and Section 1981 prohibit discrimination as to all "terms," "conditions," or "privileges" of employment, or are they limited to "significant" discriminatory employer actions only?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do Title VII and Section 1981 prohibit discrimination as to all 'terms,' 'conditions,' or 'privileges' of employment, or are they limited to 'significant' discriminatory employer actions only?

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-05
Supplemental brief of petitioner Artur Davis filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2023-06-02
Supplemental brief of respondents Legal Services Alabama, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2023-05-18
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service
2023-01-09
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-20
Reply of petitioner Artur Davis filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-12-06
Brief of respondents Legal Services Alabama, et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2022-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2022.
2022-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 7, 2022 to December 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service
2022-10-06
Response Requested. (Due November 7, 2022)
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent Legal Services Alabama, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-08-03
Application (21A863) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 9, 2022.
2022-07-29
Application (21A863) to extend further the time from August 12, 2022 to September 9, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Written RequestWritten RequestWritten RequestWritten Request
2022-06-27
Application (21A863) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 12, 2022.
2022-06-23
Application (21A863) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 13, 2022 to September 11, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service

Attorneys

Artur Davis
Brian Wolfman — Georgetown Law Appellate Courts Immersion Clinic, Petitioner
Legal Services Alabama, et al.
Albert Loring Vreeland II — Lehr Middlebrooks, et al., Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Amicus