No. 22-1240

Nicolas Tashman v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights employment employment-discrimination respondeat-superior statutory-interpretation supreme-court tortious-acts
Latest Conference: 2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

42 U.S.C. § 1981 guarantees that "[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts ... as is enjoyed by white citizens." A direct conflict exists among federal courts of appeals as to when, and under what circumstances, an employer can be held responsible under § 1981 for the acts of an employee.

This case squarely presents the following question:

Whether general common law principles of respondeat superior apply to hold an employer liable for an employee's tortious acts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether general common law principles of respondeat superior apply to hold an employer liable for an employee's tortious acts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Docket Entries

2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-12
2023-08-28
2023-06-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2023.
2023-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 27, 2023 to August 28, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-22

Attorneys

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Lori Ann SchmidtLitchfield Cavo LLP, Respondent
Andrew Samuel Connell Jr.Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Respondent
Nicolas Tashman
Mark Steven SchuverMathis, Marifian & Richter, Ltd., Petitioner