No. 22-119
Christian Action League of Minnesota, et al., v. Mike Freeman, in His Official Capacity as Hennepin County Attorney
Tags: civil-action civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-prosecution due-process enforcement-authority free-speech pre-enforcement-challenge standing
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
If a law authorizes both private and public enforcement, and a credible threat of private enforcement exists, may a plaintiff bring a pre-enforcement challenge to the law against a government official with enforcement authority?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, if a law authorizes both private and public enforcement, and a credible threat of private enforcement exists, a plaintiff may bring a pre-enforcement challenge to the law against a government official with enforcement authority
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Mike Freeman
to respond filed.
2022-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Christian Action League of Minnesota, et al.
Erick G. Kaardal — Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson P.A., Petitioner
Mike Freeman
Christiana M. Martenson — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent