A. Should the Norfolk Circuit Court have GRANTED the petitioner's
Motion to Compel Discovery and Continue the Trial , to ensure
access to Due Process in a case where the State of Virginia
was involved in removing from the petitioner both liberty and
property?

B. Were the Court's rulings in error by being in conflict with an
established Precedent in the New York Court of Appeals, 1 where
a tenant in an older co-op in was also evicted through the use
of the same objectionable-behavior lease clause, but the Court
required of the co-op a showing of good faith?

C. In light of the defendant-petitioner 's cited reasons for
requesting leave to file an amended Petition to the Supreme
Court of Virginia, in light of the content of her Amended
Petition, and if not beyond the scope of this Petition: Should
the Supreme Court of Virginia have granted the petitioner
leave to file an Amended Petition?

D. And in light of the defendant-petitioner 's cited reasons for
requesting a Rehearing in the Virginia Supreme Court, should
that Court have granted her a Rehearing?

Should the Norfolk Circuit Court have granted the petitioner's Motion to Compel Discovery and Continue the Trial