No. 21-7107
Nina Lynn Nowlan v. Bruce Gerald Randall Nowlan
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-custody civil-procedure fourth-circuit habitual-residence hague-convention international-law parental-rights wrongful-removal
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING THAT CANADA HAD BECOME AEN'S HABITUAL RESIDENCE AND THAT THEREFORE REMOVAL OF THE CHILD TO VIRGINIA WAS WRONGFUL WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred as a matter of law by affirming the district court's ruling that Canada had become AEN's habitual residence and that therefore removal of the child to Virginia was wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Bryce Nowlan to respond filed.
2022-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Bryce Nowlan
Stephen J. Cullen — Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Respondent
Nina Nowlan
Paul Graham Beers — Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte, Petitioner