No. 21-6601

Austin Woods v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-924c co-conspirator conspiracy crime-of-violence pinkerton-liability statutory-interpretation substantive-offense
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

In 1946, this Court enunciated the Pinkerton theory of liability, which permits a defendant to be held liable for a substantive offense committed by a co-conspirator if the offense was committed as part of the conspiracy. Where a defendant is convicted of conspiracy, and charged with an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) offense relating to a substantive crime of violence committed by another, can the Government prove the "crime of violence" as to a defendant using only Pinkerton liability?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Pinkerton theory of liability can be used to establish the 'crime of violence' element of an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) offense

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Austin Woods
Kevin Michael SchadOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent