Floyd Flugence v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support, the finding of guilt, in accordance with La. R.S. 14:30.1 (Second Degree Murder) where there was no specific intent, to kill?
2. Was there a constructive denial of Petitioner's right t o present a defense?
3. Did the hid court create manifest error by:
(a) allowing the jury (during deliberations) to review a videotape?
(b) modifying the video to slow motion?
4. In playing the video in slow motion, did the jury review a different form of the events with a different time frame of the events?
5. Whether the Petitioner's (P and 14fc Amendments to the United Sates Constitution were violated in the use of La. C. Qr.P. Art. 413(B)?
6. Is La C.Cr.P. Art. 413(B) in violation of the United States Constitution?
7. Whether Counsel was ineffective in violation of the # Amendment. to the United States Constitution?
8. Did Petitioner suffer a Due Process violation in the lengthy delays?
9. Is an indictment sufficient when it finis to allege the elements of fire crime?
10. Cm a Defendant present a proper defense when Ore indictment Sals to give notification of the alleged crane?
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of guilt in accordance with La. B.S. 14:30.1 (Second Degree Murder) where there was no specific intent to kill?