In a previous holding (United States v Raymond , 588 U.S., 139 S.Ct._,
204 L. Ed. 2d 897 LEXIS 4398 (2019), this Court ruled that 18 U.S.C. §3583(1*;)
was unconstitutional due to its requirement of a mandatory minimum sentence
without the benefit of a jury. This had the effect of, for the first time,
applying criminal protections to the Supervised Release Statute (18 U.S.C.
§3583). The Questions Presented in this petition are:

1) Should the Haymond ruling be considered retroactive?

2) Is Haymond in fact, a new line of jurisprudence?

3) Does the Unconstitutionality of §3583 (k) invite Constitutional
scrutiny upon the entirety of §3583?

4) If so, then does §3583 violate the 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments?

5) Is a Supervised Release Term of Life Unconstitutional?

Should the Haymond ruling be considered retroactive?