No. 21-1463
Missouri, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act anti-commandeering reliance-interests spending-clause statutory-authority tenth-amendment vaccine-mandate
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Mandate violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) because it is arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful?
2. Whether the Mandate is unconstitutional under the Spending Clause, the anti-commandeering doctrine, and the Tenth Amendment?
3. Whether the Mandate violates the APA because it was issued without notice and comment?
4. Whether the Mandate exceeds CMS's statutory authority?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the CMS vaccine mandate for healthcare workers violates the Administrative Procedure Act, the Spending Clause, the anti-commandeering doctrine, and the Tenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-09
Reply of petitioners Missouri, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-21
Brief of respondents Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-06-21
Brief amici curiae of America's Future, et al. filed.
2022-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2022)
Attorneys
America's Future, et al.
William Jeffrey Olson — William J. Olson, P.C., Amicus
Biden, President of U.S., et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Missouri, et al.
D. John Sauer — Office of the Attorney General, Petitioner