No. 21-1187
Sumotext Corp. v. Zoove, Inc., dba StarStar Mobile, et al.
Tags: antitrust antitrust-law cross-elasticity-of-demand economic-substitutes expert-testimony federal-rule-of-evidence-702 ninth-circuit-standard relevant-market rule-of-reason sherman-act
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit applies an unduly lax standard for showing whether other suitable economic substitutes are available for the products at issue, in conflict with the standard applied in other Circuits and in this Court.
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit applies an unduly lax standard for showing whether an expert's testimony is relevant and reliable, in conflict with the standard set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and as applied in other Circuits and in this Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit applies an unduly lax standard for showing whether other suitable economic substitutes are available for the products at issue
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-27
Reply of petitioner Sumotext Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2022-05-11
Brief of respondents Zoove, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2022-04-11
Response Requested. (Due May 11, 2022)
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-15
Waiver of right of respondents Zoove, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2022-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2022)
2022-02-09
Application (21A400) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 24, 2022.
2022-02-05
Application (21A400) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 10, 2022 to February 24, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Sumotext Corporation
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Zoove, Inc., et al.
Elizabeth G. Bloch — Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Respondent