No. 21-1003
F. F., as Parent of Y. F., et al. v. New York, et al.
Tags: constitutional-rights first-amendment free-exercise free-exercise-clause narrow-tailoring religious-bias religious-exemption school-vaccination strict-scrutiny vaccination-requirement
Latest Conference:
2022-05-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does New York's religious exemption repeal violate the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause because (1) either (a) it allows for secular exemptions and, thus, is not generally applicable, or (b) its enactment was motivated by religious bias and, thus, it is not neutral; and (2) it is both under- and over-inclusive and, thus, not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does New York's religious exemption repeal violate the First Amendment's Free Exercise clause
Docket Entries
2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-04-28
Reply of petitioners F.F., as Parent of Y.F., et al., filed.
2022-04-15
Brief of respondents New York, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 15, 2022.
2022-03-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 16, 2022 to April 15, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 16, 2022.
2022-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2022 to March 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 14, 2022)
Attorneys
F.F., as Parent of Y.F., et al.
Stephen Bergstein — Bergstein & Ullrich, Petitioner
New York, et al.
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent