1. The question present to this Court in this Civil Action matter, [suit or
proceeding in a court of the United States to which, against the United States],
-fa federal department, office, agency, officer, or employee(s), whom is a
party,} pursuant 28 U. S. C. ~2403 - "Intervention by United States;
constitutional question " - wherein the constitutionality of an Act of Congress
affecting the public interest is drawn into question, the court shall certify such
fact to the Attorney General, and shall permit the United States to intervene for
presentation of evidence.
The question is - Were any such documentation entries in the court 's
proceedings whether the U. S. District Court or the Appellant Sixth
Circuit Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ~2403(a) that
certified to the Attorney General the fact that the constitutionality of an
act of congress was drawn into question?

2. Does the doctrines of res-judicata and collateral estoppel fail when the
Petitioner has repeatedly disputed, proven with sufficient evidence in the
courts records of retaliations, that not any one of the necessary elements
required for this type of lawsuit {summary judgment, - dismissal} had been
established?

3. Does the doctrine of collateral estoppel [in a "employment law discrimination
Claim Pursuant to Title VII and ADEA "] of "continuous retaliation " - hostile
work environment, harassment, denials of Reasonable Accommodations], bar
or limit a subsequent claim, that were pending, being held on appeal before
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission {which the petitioner had not
exhausted "all" administrative remedies}, that "had not ripen. " for
adjudication, stop a lawsuit [summary judgment and in the alternatively
Dismissed the complaint], from being review by the courts "base on the
merits " ?

Were any such documentation entries in the court's proceedings whether the U.S. District Court or the Appellant Sixth Circuit Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ~2403(a) that certified to the Attorney General the fact that the constitutionality of an act of congress was drawn into question?