No. 20-6840
Frederick D. Darrington, Jr. v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c criminal-law criminal-statute elements-clause intimidation mens-rea physical-force statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a crime that requires proof of "intimidation" of the victim satisfies the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), when the offense does not require a specific intent to use, or threaten to use, physical force against the person of another?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a crime that requires proof of 'intimidation' of the victim satisfies the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(A), when the offense does not require a specific intent to use, or threaten to use, physical force against the person of another?
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-27
Reply of petitioner Frederick Darrington filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 14, 2021.
2021-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2021 to April 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 15, 2021.
2021-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2021 to March 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Frederick Darrington
Dan Goldberg — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent