1. The primary purpose of the Petition for an Extraordinary Writ is the exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Supreme Court's discretionary power, and that adequate relief has not been obtained in any other form and from the EEOC, lower state or federal courts. This petition is in the aid of the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. This is the primary purpose and an important question with this petition.

2. Description of Caption according to the Supreme Court Rule 20.2. "In re [Atul C. Shah as Name of Petitioner]" is a Petitioner. The "Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust and Modern Educational System" is the Respondents in the Cover Letter. So, the Petitioner Atul C. Shah, MD is a Personal feature of the Absolute Truth. The Motor Liquidation Company GUC and the Modern Educational System both are the Impersonal Feature of the Absolute Truth used in the Petition for an Extraordinary Writ with this petition. Also, there is a list of the distinguished Recipients that are persons representing the Personal Feature and the Entities are the Impersonal Feature with this petition. I am following the Supreme Court Rule 20.2 for the application of the Caption per the Vedic Wisdom of India for the Higher Dimensions and a question with this petition.

3. Whether the violation of First Amendment for practice of my Religion occurred as described in this civil case. The Prima Facie evidences, written and spoken, presented were under-investigated, distorted and put under the rug mentality by the EEOC and the federal court judges at the United Bankruptcy Court, the United District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. I expressed my personal opinion that the Vedic Literature of India is far superior and super-scientific in nature than the Conventional Modern Science including Bio-medical Science. The federal judges and Circuit judges unable to tolerate my personal opinion of the Superiority of the Vedic Literature and they dismissed my legal cases with the Concealed Intention violating my First Amendment right.

4. Whether EEOC was unable to conduct thorough investigation for Discrimination based upon my Religion, Nationality, Color and Age due to Lack of Man-Power rather than having No Merits with my Civil Case as explicitly described in my 11 Page Complaint Letter to EEOC dated December 8, 2008. EEOC did not check the box "No Merit" with their conclusive determination.

5. Whether the United States Bankruptcy Court erroneously concluded that EEOC dismissed my case with NO MERIT. The bankruptcy court did not pay any attention to the 11 Page Complaint Letter submitted to EEOC. Also, EEOC Investigator did not interview any of the Witnesses, scrutinize the Documents and Facts submitted with 11 Page Complaint Letter.

6. Whether the US Bankruptcy Court erred in not conducting the Evidentiary Hearing as suggested by the Honorable Judge Robert Gerber himself that was documented in the Bankruptcy Court Transcript dated May 15, 2012. The Honorable Judge Gerber was planning to conduct Evidentiary Hearing for testing witnesses as requested in my 11 Page EEOC Complaint Letter but Judge Gerber just forgot to conduct the Evidentiary Hearing.

7. Whether the US Bankruptcy court presided by the Honorable Judge Robert E. Gerber erred in ignoring the report of the dozens of US Congressmen in GM Bailout Debacle. My proof of claim was unfairly expunged by Judge

Whether the violation of First Amendment for practice of my Religion occurred