No. 20-5828
Roderick A. Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law burden-of-proof driver-fatigue employer-admissions employment-discrimination federal-regulations protected-activity retaliation staa-protection trucking-safety whistleblower-protection
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
When an employer admits to a violation in writing to the federal government, should they be held accountable to their words?
When a protected activity is made, is it protected ,or is the bar so low where it can be disrupted by a ALJ simply saying that person was not telling the truth when they made the complaint?
Once a protected activity is established, can an ALJ ask for it to be interpreted to mean something different than the protected activity?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When an employer admits to a violation in writing to the federal government, should they be held accountable to their words?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-25
Brief of respondents CPC Logistics, Inc. and CPC Medical Products, LLC in opposition filed.
2020-10-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 27, 2020.
2020-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2020 to November 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2020)
Attorneys
CPC Logistics, Inc. and CPC Medical Products, LLC
Michael Francis Harris — Harris, Dowell, Fisher & Young, L.C., Respondent
Michael F. Harris — Harris Dowell Fisher & Young, L.C., Respondent
Roderick A. Carter
Roderick A. Carter — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent