No. 20-495
Charee Stanley v. ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: cba-interpretation circuit-split federal-preemption federal-statutory-claims mandatory-arbitration preemption railway-labor-act title-vii undue-hardship
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether, and under what circumstances, claims arising under federal statute are subject to the RLA's mandatory arbitration requirement.
2. Whether the "undue hardship" inquiry in a Title VII case is an affirmative defense to liability.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the RLA's mandatory arbitration requirement applies to federal statutory claims
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent Express Airlines, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Charee Stanley
Joseph Carl Cecere — Cecere, PC, Petitioner
Express Airlines, Inc.
Sarah Pierce Wimberly — Ford & Harrison LLP, Respondent