No. 20-257
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al. v. Maxcimo Scott, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure class-certification collective-action district-court employment-law fair-labor-standards-act material-question opt-in-plaintiffs similarly-situated
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Privacy ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Privacy ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-22
(distributed 5 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court may consider factors other than the presence of a single material question of law or fact common to a group of employees when assessing whether the employees are "similarly situated" for purposes of the collective-action provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court may consider factors other than the presence of a single material question of law or fact common to a group of employees when assessing whether the employees are 'similarly situated' for purposes of the collective-action provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Entries
2021-12-21
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-12-17
Joint stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2021-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2021-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2021-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-31
Joint motion to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed.
2020-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-11-17
Reply of petitioners Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-02
Brief of respondents Maxcimo Scott, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-10-01
Brief amicus curiae of The Wage & Hour Defense Institute filed.
2020-10-01
Brief amici curiae of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar, et al. filed.
2020-10-01
Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
2020-10-01
Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., And Restaurant Law Center filed.
2020-09-16
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Maxcimo Scott, et al.
2020-09-15
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al.
2020-09-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 2, 2020. See Rule 30.1.
2020-09-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al.
DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar
Matthew T. Nelson — Warner Norcross + Judd LLP, Amicus
Maxcimo Scott, et al.
Wayne N. Outten — Outten & Golden LLP, Respondent
Retail Litigation Center, Inc., And Restaurant Law Center
Paul DeCamp — Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Amicus
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and The National Retail Federation
Scott A. Keller — Baker Botts LLP, Amicus
The Wage & Hour Defense Institute
Joseph George Schmitt — Nilan Johnson Lewis PA, Amicus