No. 20-1350
Go New York Tours, Inc. v. Gray Line New York Tours, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: anticompetitive-conduct antitrust antitrust-conspiracy circumstantial-evidence civil-procedure parallel-conduct pleading-standards plus-factors section-1 sherman-act twombly
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a plaintiff must allege evidence of "plus factors" in addition to parallel anticompetitive conduct in order to plead an antitrust conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
2. Whether allegations of circumstantial evidence falling short of dispositive "plus factors" may be sufficient to plead an antitrust conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plaintiff must allege evidence of 'plus factors' in addition to parallel anticompetitive conduct to plead an antitrust conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman Act
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondents Gray Line New York Tours, Inc., Twin America, LLC, Sightseeing Pass LLC to respond filed.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondents Big Bus Tours Group Holdings Limited, et al. to respond filed.
2021-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Big Bus Tours Group Holdings Limited, et al.
Michael Lacovara — Latham & Watkins LLP, Respondent
Gray Line New York Tours, Inc., Twin America, LLC, Sightseeing Pass LLC
Jonathan M. Jacobson — Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Respondent