No. 20-1305
Douglas J. Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Joy Eberline, et al.
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: all-circumstances discrete-tasks employee-classification employee-status employment employment-status fair-labor-standards-act intern-status labor-law student-intern-trainee workplace-rights
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Securities WageAndHour
Arbitration ERISA Securities WageAndHour
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fair Labor Standards Act requires a court to consider all the circumstances of the parties' relationship, or only those discrete tasks identified by the plaintiff, in assessing whether a student, intern, or trainee is an employee under the Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fair Labor Standards Act requires a court to consider all the circumstances of the parties' relationship, or only those discrete tasks identified by the plaintiff, in assessing whether a student, intern, or trainee is an employee under the Act
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by American Association of Cosmetology Schools GRANTED.
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-17
Reply of petitioners Douglas J. Holdings, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-30
Brief of respondents Joy Eberline, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-04-19
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by American Association of Cosmetology Schools.
2021-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.
2021-04-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 19, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)
Attorneys
American Association of Cosmetology Schools
Robert M. Palumbos — Duane Morris LLP, Amicus
Douglas J. Holdings, Inc., et al.
Matthew T. Nelson — Warner Norcross + Judd LLP, Petitioner
Joy Eberline, et al.
Kathryn Bruner James — Goodman Hurwitz & James P.C., Respondent