1) Did the Court of Appeals err by affirming the District Court setting aside the United Kingdom's Central Authority Certificate of Compliance without undertaking a "lack of notice" or a "prejudice" inquiry?

2) Did the Court of Appeals err by affirming the District Court setting aside the United Kingdom's Central Authority Certificate of Compliance even though Petitioners had complied with local rules and Appellees had actual notice?

3) Did the Court of Appeals err by affirming the District Court's decision to give determinative authority to Appellee's affidavit, claiming that the address was not the proper residence, despite the facts that: (1) the Appellee listed that address on U.S. Customs documents as his address for purposes of importing vehicles, (2) the Appellee's wife used that address as her residence when registering a company, (3) the Appellee's sister owned the residence at that address, which had multiple bedrooms and out of which she operated a Bed and Breakfast; (4) Appellee identified his "sister's address" as an address he used for business in response to Interrogatories; and (5) Appellee identified his sister's address as one where he and Petitioners "stayed"?

Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the District Court's dismissal of the case due to insufficient service of process?