1. Whether subject matter jurisdiction matter was properly
invoked involving a continuing violation of Title VII, 1983
etc in the underlying claims of retaliation and hostile
environment conditions in the reinstatement process of a
jury award and reinstatement.

2. Whether a timely well-pled complaint and court record
pleading was sufficient to withstand dismissal by Rule 12
(b)(6) when a prior case won by Jury trial by the petitioner
is a continuing violation of repeated acts and or the
petitioner is accused of being handicapped disabled.

3. Whether the District Court and the Third Circuit deviated
from acceptable judicial proceeding in this case that
requires this courts supervisory power pursuant to Rule 10.

4. Whether procedural process denied the rights of the
petitioner by misrepresentation and criminal acts during
the appeals process and the misleading and violations of the
rules of professional conduct involving attorneys hired by
the petitioners

5. Whether the Respondents attorney took steps to overturn a
jury award by misguided and criminal acts. Aiding and
abetting the distribution of the Back Pay Award to avoid
proper IRS Tax reporting and withholdings. Giving and
allowing the petitioners attorney Leonard Sweeney to
illegally endorse forgery of the check to cash out of State.
Commingling the funds without the knowledge of the
petitioner. TAX FRAUD

6. Whether Petitioners Attorney Christopher P. Skatell
misrepresented the petitioner. The Petitioner does not
understand the filing of case No. 2:18 -cv-01409 by his
attorney when the attorney was fully briefed and knew of
the appeal PRO SE and the extension was denied knowing
that he had to File for the Writ of Certiorari. To file the
1983 and Title Vii would be fruitless and the case would be
dismissed by res judicata. Unbelievable especially after the
promises of Christopher p. Skatell to prosecute Leonard
Sweeney, to end my pension hearing quickly with the
evidence supplied and to re-file my 1983. Title Vii claims
appeal to SCOTUS,

7. Whether Petitioner was abused of his constitutional rights
to protect the perpetrators by the attorney Christopher P.
Skatell involving violations of Professional Conduct while
draining the petitioners Bank Account while withholding
factual evidence from the Honorable Courts and Pension
hearing examiner. Falsely representing the petitioner for
monetary and political gain.

8. Whether the petitioner was set up into Tax Fraud one way
or the other.

9. Whether a Lower Court is or is not Restricted to Act Even
when a case is marked as Closed on the Docket and
Notices. Case 97-0786 Case3-15-cv-00058 and Case No.
2:18-cv-01409

Question not identified