1. Did the trial Code And The Appellate Court error within entering a finding of quilt On a Single count Robbery when the government Cid net Prove petitioner | eais guilty beyond a reasenable doubt ?

2. Was the Circuit Court within their Governmental Rights to have Charged an indictment offense of Robbery, And alse rye ape » ha of Robbery when the Ceminal complauit Ceports @ difterent Neon Alon OCCUNTANCE T Under tying facts)

3. Ls the Defendant deprived of his due process, t ightS uncer she Constitutions of the Stote cf Titinois ond the Unde States ?

4 Was the dnal Tudge Bas and prejudice to have found she . Defendant guilty anid Sentenced the Defendant 40 an extended term sentencing Because the yudge believed the Defendant was guilty based on Defendants priot criminal convicts ans ?

Did the trial court and appellate court err in entering a finding of guilt on a single count robbery when the government did not prove petitioner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?