No. 19-7529
Veronica A. Williams v. Litton Loan Services, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights dodd-frank-act due-process financial-fraud fraud glass-steagall-act institutional-deception mortgage-servicing pro-se-assistance pro-se-litigation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Trademark Privacy
DueProcess Securities Trademark Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) How long will legal deception, fraud and stonewalling be allowed to obfuscate and enable financial fraud at the expense of borrowers and investors?
2) Do process errors supersede the facts and the law?
3) Are designated Federal Pro Se organizations allowed to deny assistance to Pro Se Petitioners who reveal illegal acts; even acts by people and organizations in power?
4) What changes to the Dodd Frank Act H.R. 4173 are needed to close the holes unearthed by the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act of 1932 ? What additional regulations are needed to control fraud?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether lower courts failed to facilitate due process for the Petitioner
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-02-21
Waiver of right of respondents Litton Loan Servicing, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Litton Loan Servicing, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al.
Robert L. Byer — Duane Morris LLP, Respondent
Veronica A. Williams
Veronica A. Williams — Petitioner