Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113) which may be committed by unintentionally intimidating a victim or by presenting a teller with a demand note, has as an element "the use of physical force against the person or property of another." under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A).
II. While the Eleventh Circuit (and many other circuits) has held fast to the notion that bank robbery by intimidation qualifies as a "crime of violence" under § 924(c)'s elements clause, some other circuits have recently determined similar state statutes to not qualify as "violent felonies" under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, creating a conflict amongst the Circuit courts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113) qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-05-23
Reply of petitioner Jurden Rogers filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent Solicitor General of the United States in opposition filed.
2020-04-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2020.
2020-04-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 19, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-18
Response Requested. (Due March 19, 2020)
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)