The auto repair LAWS: 9884.16 and 9884.9; CONFLICTS and INVALIDATES the ELEMENTS of ROBBERY, specifically forces the auto repair shop TOO FORFEIT their POSSESSION and PROPERTY INTERESTS. How can petitioner be charged or convicted for ROBBERY, when the auto repair LAWS: 9884.16 and 9884.9; CONFLICTS and INVALIDATES the ELEMENTS of ROBBERY, specifically forces the auto repair shop TOO FORFEIT their POSSESSION and PROPERTY INTERESTS?

How come petitioner has been convicted with the use of DECEIVING and TAINTED testimony?

How come the MANDATED auto repair LAWS were NOT APPLIED at petitioner's Trial?

Under Habeas Corpus, can this Court take NOTICE of a previous UNCONSTITUTIONAL ERROR having a SUBSTANTIAL injurious EFFECT and RIGHTS?

Under Habeas Corpus, when a prisoner with pro per. and DILIGENCE has DISCOVERED NEW EVIDENCE; AND has COMPLIED with ALL State/Federal LAWS and RULES governing filings for NEW EVIDENCE; why is petitioner denied review?

In the State of California, can auto repair shops OPERATE an ILLEGAL BUSINESS; that LURES customers in for SERVICES, and a business DISPUTE ENSUES because of services; can an auto repair SHOP USE CRIMINAL THREATS and DISPLAY FIREARMS TOO ENFORCE an ILLEGAL BENEFIT OF LIEN?

Under Habeas Corpus, can this Court take NOTICE of a previous UNconstitutional ERROR having a Substantial INjurious EFFECT