No. 19-724
Keith Y. Arakaki v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: adverse-action civil-procedure civil-rights employment-discrimination pretext retaliation summary-judgment title-vii
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
(i) Whether the four discrete events Petitioner raised in opposing Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment constituted adverse actions in accordance with the spirit and intent of Title VII retaliations claims, a remedial statute?
(ii) Whether Petitioner raised sufficient evidence of pretext to defeat Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the four discrete events Petitioner raised in opposing Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment constituted adverse actions in accordance with the spirit and intent of Title VII retaliations claims, a remedial statute?
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent Brennan, Megan, et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Brennan, Megan, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Keith Arakaki
Shawn Anthony Luiz — Shawn A. Luiz, Attorney at Law, Petitioner