(1) - Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abuse Petitioner's 5th Amendment
due process right to be heard on his Bivens claim on appeal by summarily
dismissing his appeal without ever hearing or addressing his Bivens claim
of complaint [which is a due process violation].

(2) - Did the District Court abuse it's discretion when it dismissed Petitioner's
Bivens claim of complaint without hearing or addressing his Bivens claim.

(3) - Does a denial of a federal Bivens claim review involving "theft " of an inmate's
property by a BOP officer warrant 'new perspective' federal review consideration
under the Parratt v. Taylor doctrine by this Court.

(4) - Can a Petitioner file in forma pauperis in the Supreme Court in a Civil Case
[particularly when the BOP is already under investigation for similar inmate
abuse violations pending in another case recently filed in the lower court].
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida) demanded the BOP conduct a thorough review at
Coleman due to the pending case and the 'systemic' abuse.

Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abuse Petitioner's 5th Amendment due-process right to be heard on his Bivens claim on appeal by summarily dismissing his appeal without ever hearing or addressing his Bivens claim of complaint [which is a due-process violation]