No. 19-6354
Brent Delvalen Blake v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-2113 18-usc-924c bank-robbery categorical-approach certificate-of-appealability crime-of-violence criminal-statute elements-clause federal-armed-bank-robbery intent physical-force vagueness vagueness-doctrine violent-crime
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can reasonable jurists debate whether federal armed bank robbery by intimidation is not a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) because the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threatened use of violent physical force?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can reasonable jurists debate whether federal armed bank robbery by intimidation is not a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) because the offense fails to require any intentional use, attempted use, or threatened use of violent physical force?
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-02-28
Reply of petitioners Brent Blake, et al. filed.
2020-02-14
Brief of respondent United of States in opposition filed.
2020-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 14, 2020.
2020-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2020.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-18
Response Requested. (Due December 18, 2019)
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
Attorneys
BRENT BLAKE, et al.
Ann Catherine McClintock — Federal Defender's Office, Petitioner
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent