I. Did the lower courts err in determining that retention of the
child was wrongful under Articles 3 and 5 of the Hague Convention of
25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
despite Articles 252 and 261 of the Guatemalan Civil Code giving Ms.
Velasquez custody of the Child?

II. Did the Eleventh Circuit err and violate Abbott v. Abbott, 560
U.S. 1 (2010) by finding that Ms. Velasquez had ne exeat rights yet
upholding the District Court 's finding that Ms. Velasquez wrongfully
retained the Child?

Did the lower courts err in determining that retention of the child was wrongful under the Hague Convention despite Guatemalan law giving custody to the mother?