No. 19-5887
Arthur O. Armstrong v. John Doe
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure-rule-60-b-6 conspiracy constitutional-rights disclosure-of-corporate-affiliation due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment liberty probable-cause property rule-60 standing
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Whether petitioner was deprived of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
Whether respondents acted in a conspiracy.
Whether there was probable cause.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief, pursuant to Rule 60 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Arthur O. Armstrong
Arthur O. Armstrong — Petitioner