1. Whether the court of appeals erred when it upheld a district court opinion that conflicted with decided Supreme Court case law for EEO retaliation and "Cat's Paw" negligence under Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 704(a), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), and failed to consider Petitioner's request to apply "Cat's Paw" negligence liability, and upheld a dismissal of his Title VII Civil Rights Act EEO discrimination case by the District Court for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil P. 58, and violated his constitutional due process rights.

2. Whether the alternative review process offered by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), as an emergency option due to the lack of a functioning quorum, negatively influence and impact a Petitioner's due process rights when processing Title VII EEO mixed cases.

Whether the court of appeals erred when it upheld a district court opinion that conflicted with decided Supreme Court case law for EEO retaliation and 'Cat's Paw' negligence under Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 704(a), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), and failed to consider Petitioner's request to apply 'Cat's Paw' negligence liability, and upheld a dismissal of his Title VII Civil Rights Act EEO discrimination case by the District Court for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil P. 58, and violated his constitutional due process rights