Xiao-Ying Yu v. Robert R. Neall, Secretary, Maryland Department of Health, et al.
1. Whether the lower courts ' refusal to consider
EEOC 's right-to-sue letter (attached to Petitioner 's
response) and her statements as part of pleadings,
and her request and leave for amendment with this
letter and new evidence, thereby affirming district
courts ' dismissal for genuine reason "lack of subject-
matter jurisdiction " without jury and hearing,
impacts this Court 's jurisdiction to decide this case.
2. Does the application of Congress ' abrogation of
11th Amendment immunity and Section 504 of
Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.§794 have limits on
federal funding-supported public service employees '
civil actions in response to termination of their
employment without mitigation as retaliation
against their pre-EEOC 's ADA, Title VII and ADEA
charges and seniority system in the U.S. district and
appellate courts?
3. Whether damages can be awarded under Title
VII, ADA, 42 U.S. Code §12202&12203, 29
U.S.C. §794 when there is failure to prove employers '
prior-mitigation of termination of employment
under 14th Amendment U.S.C., and if so, whether
there is an exception to federal diversity jurisdiction.
4. Whether the U.S. court of appeals ' denial of
Petitioner 's right to dispute genuine facts by using
local rules amounts to a violation of Petitioner 's
rights to the two clauses of 14th Amendment to
U.S.CONST., and can be supervised by this Court.
Whether the lower courts' refusal to consider EEOC's right-to-sue letter and her statements as part of pleadings, and her request and leave for amendment with this letter and new evidence, thereby affirming district courts' dismissal for genuine reason 'lack of subject-matter jurisdiction' without jury and hearing, impacts this Court's jurisdiction to decide this case