No. 19-178
Jagdish C. Laul v. Los Alamos National Laboratories
Tags: burden-shifting civil-procedure employment-discrimination inference-weighing jury-competency jury-trial-right mcdonnell-douglas motive motive-determination seventh-amendment summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does requiring the trial judge to weigh inferences (and in some cases inferences from inferences) and determine motive from competing testimony deprive a plaintiff of his Seventh Amendment right to make his case to a jury?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does requiring the trial judge to weigh inferences (and in some cases inferences from inferences) and determine motive from competing testimony deprive a plaintiff of his Seventh Amendment right to make his case to a jury?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-06
Reply of petitioner Jagdish Laul filed. (Received 11/12/2019)
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-09
Brief of respondent Los Alamos National Laboratories in opposition filed.
2019-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2019.
2019-08-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2019 to October 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Jagdish Laul
Los Alamos National Laboratories
Ellen Sullivan Casey — Hinkle Shanor LLP, Respondent