A. Whether the First Circuit deprived Petitioner of
her constitutional right to a jury trial when it
massaged the facts in violation of Rule 56 and , thus,dismissed her employment discrimination andretaliation claims.

B. Whether this Court should exercise its
supervisory power and provide effective means to holdlower courts accountable by requiring them to spell outtheir analysis regarding whether genuine issues exist,as a prerequisite to granting summary judgment.

C. In the alternative, whether the First Circuit's
massaging of the facts and misapprehension of thegoverning standard warrants summary reversal.

Whether the First Circuit deprived Petitioner of her constitutional right to a jury trial