No. 18-9539

Keenan Brown v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law discrimination due-process employment employment-discrimination federal-jurisdiction retaliation standing statutory-interpretation summary-judgment whistle-blower
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Illinois Northern District Court erred its decision by not properly exercising Rule 56 Summary Judgment with all evidence being examined as a whole?

Did the Seventh Circuit Court Appeals & Illinois Northern District Court erred it's decision by not applying the Petitioner constitutional Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2 for unlawful employment practices ,42 U.S.C. §2000e-3 other employment practices 29 U.S.C. §791(a)-(b) prohibits against age,42 U.S.C. §12203 prohibits against retaliations and coercion 42 U.S.C. §12117, -21233 & 12188 (a) (b)Bill of Rights First Amendment & Whistle Blower Act of 1984 Discrimination Act

Did the Illinois Northern District Court & Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred it's a decision without truly understanding of the evidence of undisputed facts in this case?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Illinois Northern District Court erred its decision by not properly exercising Rule 56 Summary Judgment with all evidence being examined as a whole?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Keenan Brown
Keenan Brown — Petitioner
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Elizabeth M. BartolucciO'Hagan Meyer, LLC, Respondent