Whether the Housing Authority of the City of Lo Angeles' (HACLA) Administrative Plan required to accommodate all disabled voucher holders is unreasonable in its particular policy or practice that has a disproportionately adverse effect on members of a class protected in circumstances as dire as Appellant's?

Whether HACLA's practice or policy has caused, or will cause, a discriminatory effect on members of a protected class?

Whether the important questions of law are presented which are of national and statewide importance?

Whether the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles' (HACLA) Administrative Plan required to accommodate all disabled voucher holders is unreasonable in its particular policy or practice that has a disproportionately adverse effect on members of a class protected in circumstances as dire as Appellant's?