L. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT WITN OBLINK AGENC
___ MS. TENNTE ROWEN, DENTED P TONER HIS DUE PROCESS OF LAV

On [UTIONAL RIGHTS AY R NG TO ALLOW HIM AN INFORMA

HEARING, A R TERMINATING RIM FROM THE PROGRAM, AND

f\ NG CRIMINAL ACTION FOR AN ° D THAT SHOULD

2. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENTED DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL

OF COMMERCE, FOR REFUSING TO ALLOW PETITIONER AN OPPORT
___UNTTY FOR TNFORMAL HEARTNG AT THE LOCAL LEVEL,

3. WHETHER PETITIONER FOURTH AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL
___ RIGHTS, ALSO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS SUCH AS ART. T 810.Fx POST FACTO.
___ LAW TMPATRING THE OBLIGRTTONS OF CONTRACTS, BY LEADING
_ PROSECUTOR ALLOWING PETONER TO BE TRY, AND CONVICTED FOR
___CREMTNAL MATTERS, WHERE ALL FVDENCE SUCH AS WIA, AGBEEN
: 0 6 ETITON
___ACTTONS AND CONDUCT COULO ONLY BE AN CIVTL MATTER.

4. WHETHER PETITIONER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, WHERE VIOLATED
___BY fils, Lavan PB WATSON, WITH U.S, DEPARTMENT OF LAROR, BY NOT __
_ ALIEGTNG NO VIOLATIONS OF WIA STATUTE AND REGULATTONS,

Whether the trial court and administrative agency denied petitioner due process and equal protection rights by terminating him from a program without an informal hearing