No. 18-7093
Deidre Holmes Clark v. Allen & Overy, LLP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process emotional-stability first-amendment free-speech psychiatric-evaluation sexual-harassment standing
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a sexual harassment motion can be dismissed, solely on the basis of her right to free speech.
Whether a requirement that a sexual harassment victim see a psychiatrist to determine her "emotional stability" means that the State has control what she says in such meeting.
Whether due process and the First Amendment are violated when such Plaintiff speaks freely during such forced psychiatric evaluation.
Whether a sexual harassment victim can be forced to be emotionally evaluated by a psychiatrist.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sexual harassment motion can be dismissed, solely on the basis of her right to free speech
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent Allen & Overy, LLP to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Allen & Overy, LLP
Kathleen M. McKenna — Proskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
Deidre Holmes Clark
Deidre Holmes Clark — Petitioner