No. 18-686

Lazina King, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: dodd-frank-act dual-tracking foreclosure-law jury-trial private-right-of-action real-estate-settlement-procedures-act regulation-x respa-regulation seventh-amendment statutory-damages
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is the RE SPA Regulation X Section 6(1) which was promulgated by Dodd-Frank Act remedial in nature which provides a private right of action to an injured party for violations of the Act and does the seventh amendment grant a right to a jury trial when the act has been violated and the injured party request a jury trial to recover statutory damages for 12 U.S.C. § 2605 (1) (1) 12 C.F.R. § 1024.41(g) violations?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the RESPA Regulation X Section 6(f) which was promulgated by Dodd-Frank Act remedial in nature which provides a private right of action to an injured party for violations of the Act and does the seventh amendment grant a right to a jury trial when the act has been violated and the injured party request a jury trial to recover statutory damages for 12 U.S.C. § 2605 (f) (1) 12 C.F.R. § 1024.41(g) violations?

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-15
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Lazina King
Lazina King — Petitioner