No. 18-6690

Eric Lawson v. Kelly Speight, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1981 civil-rights civil-rights-act-of-1964 due-process employment-discrimination in-forma-pauperis judicial-authority race-discrimination retaliation right-to-sue standing title-vii wrongful-termination
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner filed an early lawsuit for employment discrimination in 2017. The District Court agreed that Petitioner never received the Magistrate orders, therefore, Petitioner filed another same suit on July 5, 2017, then filed an amendment suit thereto of the same in January and February 2018.

Does the Petitioner have the right to sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964, even after he has received his letter of right to sue on June 18, 2018.

Does the Petitioner have the right to sue for employment discrimination under the 42 U.S.C. 1981.706,77'B, 706(G)_ within his class of Former employment with over 600 employees of all race etc at Former Medtronic, New Cardinal? Race discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation, hostile work environments etc..., termination process, procedures etc...

Does the U.S. District Court, for Southern District of Georgia, Augusta Division, J. Randall Hall, Chief Judge is beyond the law, and disregards F.R.C.P. and F.R.C.P. 8 (), 60 B etc. that within 30 days of filing a complaint, a defendant must respond or the Plaintiff-Petitioner shall win recovery in complaint. The Defendants never responded nor submitted reasons why they did not respond, so Petitioners Motion for Contempt of Court, November 28,2017, should be granted. He abused his authority.

Have the below Courts, U.S. District Court Judge Magistrate and Chief Judge herein abuse their authority in granting Petitioner-Plaintiff IFP- In Forma Pauperis status on November 6 ,2017, but when he appealed to the U,S, 1 11Circuit of Appeal they denied hi, the IFP status, even though he showed unemployment status

The Court of Appeals denied Petitioner, Plaintiff, Appellant IFP - Informa Pauperis too, after he showed unemployment status as well, July 31, 2018, by Stanley Marcus, U.S. Circuit Court Judge. He was also denied EN-BANC process and all records be submitted to their court from the district court and for as Attorney-Attorney to assist him. Have they abused their authority and the case should be remanded back to District Court, with another Chief Judge besides J. Randall Hall as the overseer.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Petitioner have the right to sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, even after he has received his letter of right to sue?

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)

Attorneys

Eric Lawson
Eric Lawson — Petitioner