Billy Wayne Locke v. United States
The Fed. gavetnmant The RighT
am
cF My Property
Thay
hale posgessicy
search
Mnarrawt anod
The Fedigou Deny Thet
S
For TaTe
p2k.18820
waS GM AT.F. AgNT ThaF
2
anot used iT
The
gun From.
AgenT ThaT Semove
passesson ofmy
This noT PegT The Fod. you
APPiY
DEs
CarS TO,ThaDTO
ConsTrlerice
te
269
ion?
over fid
ThaT Ia
ThaT soys
ProperTy ThaT wos
mei
and nT ReTurved
p2k
Thay Pd Rofused To ha
Did The Appeals court abube iFs discretion uhen
challenges The ed validity of h's
s femaining argumenTs Thet
any kind of a crime wiTh one. and am not a violnt
er ComriTTed
len.eiThel JusT xfelon
ina
constirytions 2nd Anend when ann a man has Nevar violated
e. never
Thi's Lau is JusT
court Pleafe. rell me how
rPases, iwould
This
uhen I an sifTi
e Dose not infringe on my Seneand Amend. Right?
exercising
MY ConsTiTTional R
son For no other Peson Thal Simpely
hacing
j2l105
Nie
1K0
and dose This not puT the
Es0h 11o 16 k1a1d h to 42i652550
what gives
e
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the government seized his personal property without just compensation