No. 18-6083
Jesus Manuel Laureano-Perez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process government-prosecution plea-agreement sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review uncharged-conduct
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine whether the district court erred in enhancing Laureano's sentence based on uncharged conduct not contemplated by the government?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in enhancing Laureano's sentence based on uncharged conduct
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Jesus Laureano-Perez
Jesus Manuel Laureano-Perez — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent