No. 18-6015
Gustavo Torres-Medel v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cross-examination defense-presentation discovery expert-witness ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-rights trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Were Acker dents Sixth Ameadment rights
tt preloted when
DD frial counsel Farled to utilize an expert
ness
trial counsel farted te present delense
Hetassses and cthectiuely, creszexectine diate
Wetneses
dB tal counsel falled fe obtain fall discovers
IB Dd the Distret Court ere in ruling delenchots.
__iiineMective_assiitance claims were _proceckvally
a eReeltet
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were violated when trial counsel failed to utilize an expert witness, failed to present defense witnesses effectively, and failed to obtain full discovery
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent Lashbrook, Warden to respond filed.
2018-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)
Attorneys
Gustavo Torres-Medel
Gustavo Torres-Medel — Petitioner
Lashbrook, Warden
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent